In history we learned of jesus born 3 b.c. and died in 30 a.d. during augustus and tiberius's rein as the 1st and 2nd eperors of the Roman Empire, but it only showed that jesus was only a jewish prophet who preached about god .... and that the apostled paul and peter were martyred and killed in 68 a.d. during nero's reighn{5th emperor}. But this alone doesn't prove gods exsistance only as a delusional prophets preaching of a supreme being which angered tiberius, who during the roman empire age was seen as a god, and had jesus crusified for this disregaurd for the roman law of the time.
Answers (8)
Thats right!!! I totally agree with Shoes_!!! I will beleive in the one true God no matter what!!!
Yes, so we do not have anything do worry about! So, Marcuz you are wrong there is a LOT of scientific proof that God is real.
shoes_, you do realise that just because you believe in God (and have admitted that you would even though there was no evidence, which is kinda stupid) that does not mean that there's scientific evidence for God? Believing something, even if you believe with all your heart, doesn't make it rational and certainly doesn't make the thing you believe in real.
She has faith
The Bible tells of his existence. Everything that the Bible says is true. However, archeoligists do not believe this and they're always trying to find proof that the Bible is not true. (Only the King James version is true.) One time an archeoligists went to find proof that the Bible was not true but the more he searched for evidence the more he found out that the Bible is true.
You go girl!!! Thats right you should listen to her, she's da bomb!!!LOL!!!
well, first of all im the pastors kid so wat i say may be alitle confusing but i THINK i no wat im saying. the only thing to prove that god exists is the word of the bible, and not every thing in the bible is true because it was written by normal people, god didnt write it, so all the veiws in the bible hav the probobility of being tanted, or bias. and while there is proof of jesus' existance, ther is no direct evedence of him being gods son, but there is alot of circomstantial evedince. and the king james version is not the only true version, seeing how it is a Version, the original is the only untainted copy.
Your argument consists of circular logic (essentially: the Bible says its true, therefore its true) and an anecdote about one parrticular archeoogist (who you don't name) one day deciding to believe the Bible was true. You even concede that the vast majority of experts on whether things happened or not in the past (archeologists) don't believe the events in the Bible are accurate. It's an abysmal argument, as should be clear to anyone who stops to think about it.
Yes, there is proof in the Bible of the one true God. There are several verses that tell you who God is. Here are some of them:
Genesis 1:1, Genesis 17:1, Genesis 50:20, Exodus 8:10, Exodus 20:5, Numbers 23:19, Deuteronomy 4:31, Deuteronomy 6:4-5, Deuteronomy 32:4, Nehemiah 9:17, Psalm 46:1, Psalm 71:22, John 1:18, John 3:16, John 4:24, 1 Corinthians 10:13, 1 Corinthians 14:33, Hebrews 12:10, James 1:13, 1 John 4:16, and Revelation 4:8.
If want more information about the evidence of God then go to www.everystudent.com. Glad to help you! If you want more information then you can ask me!!!
Thanks for commenting on mine and voting it up! I am commenting on yours and I voted yours up too! Thanks I will definetly go on that website and look up those verses! Keep on posting questions about God, Jesus, Bible, or other events that happened in Bible times! I am sure kraz4jesus and I will be able to answer them. ☺☻:)
Its been a very long time since I touched a bible, so I wouln't know the verses. But thanks anyways.
technicly, there is no sientific proof of god, all simple faith. because sience is a creation of man and there is no need for god to prove himself (that is also in the bible). but the only true proof is that of oral tradition, if someone told another of contact with god and that person told another and so on
I can't believe I have to say this but... just because a book says something, doesn't mean the things that the books says are true, even if the book really insists that everything it has to say is true. I mean, seriously, I can't see how one could even begin to imagine that this is a remotely credible argument, I mean no disrespect to you, but you must be able to see how bad this looks as an argument for anything.
there is no real proof is the bible of an existing, and proof will never be found.
the bible was written 400-800 years after Yeshua of Nazareth lived (and yes this is proven in roman writing of the time).
there's nothing wrong with believing in one or multiple gods, but religious people should let non-believers unbothered.
some people get real hope out of their religion which is great. But people shouldnt die or suffer in name of their religion or harm others, thats the case nowadays and has been the case always.
we should listen to one thing in the bible, love others like you love your brother.
There is scientific proof! Isn't there? Well, I will believe in God no matter what anybody says.