Science and the Genesis Account how do they compare?

Science disproves science and nobody cares. Scientists say the stupidest things, and everybody thinks you are a moron if you point out that those things don't make sense. Most people don't read the Genesis account, and those that do can't read it the way it's written, so there is very little to discuss until you find somebody who doesn't pre-suppose that they already know everything.

Example 1. The bible says "In the beginning god created the heaven and the earth." People say no, it took six days and was done a bit at a time.

Example 2. Genesis says God made two lights, a greater light and a lesser light. Ancient Egyptians recorded two suns before the one we have now. Scientists insist there have been no changes ever.

Example 3. Genesis 1 records three uses of the word 'create': verse 1, verse 21, and verse 27. People will tell you that God created animals and grass and on and on.

It might interest you to know that there were eye witnesses to what we mistakenly call creation. They recorded their observations as best they could, carving some records into stones and passing verbal accounts from one generation to the next. It has taken a very long time to interpret these records because they don't describe anything we have seen. For example the legend of the dragon is carved into rocks all over the world, but it is only recently that anybody has noticed a natural effect that fits that description. This is a long book because it tries to cover everything completely.
www.saturniancosmology.org/